Joseph Mendola , Goodness and Justice : A Consequentialist Moral
نویسنده
چکیده
Joseph Mendola’s ambitious goal in this philosophically rich book is to provide a comprehensive account of goodness and justice which coheres with our intuitions and which is also thoroughly justified by independent metaphysical arguments. The project has three distinct parts. The first part develops a new form of act-consequentialism, which focuses on group agents and their acts, called Multiple-Act-Consequentialism or MAC. The second part defends a hedonist theory of the good, and the third part defends a very riskaverse maximin principle. The second and third parts together give us his Hedonic Maximin Principle or HMP. MAC is a promising new approach to consequentialism, even if it does not deliver the degree of coherence between consequentialism and common sense that Mendola promises. HMP, on the other hand, is wildly implausible. It would be interesting to see MAC developed without HMP. Only the committed reader will discover the deeply counter-intuitive nature of Mendola’s HMP, which is not revealed until near the end of the book. Mendola explains:
منابع مشابه
A Moral Analysis of the Conflict between Justice and Goodness from the Standpoint of Imam Ali
There has been a long-lasting problem in ethics: how can one think of justice and goodness as consistent? Imam Ali also explores the connection between them. Whereas he defined justice as “putting things in their places” or “giving everyone his own right”, he referred to the common good as “what is achieved by justice” to show that the common good depends on justice. On the other hand, there ar...
متن کاملDeterminism and the Antiquated Deontology of the Social Sciences
This article shows how the social sciences, particularly human geography, rejected hard determinism by the mid-twentieth century largely on the deontological basis that it is irreconcilable with social justice, yet this rejection came just before a burst of creative development in consequentialist theories of social justice that problematize a facile rejection of determinism on moral grounds, a...
متن کاملThe Discovery of Islamic Ethics in Organizational Silence
Organizational silence is one of the emerging issues in the field of ethics and organizational behavior management. Most of the existing writings, having thought its moral falsity as something established, have sought to analyze the causes and factors. The present paper, disagreeing the presupposition and being inspired by the "processional method of exploring Islamic theory", seeks to discover...
متن کاملRunning Head: RELIGIOSITY AND CONSEQUENTIALIST MORAL THINKING Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Consequentialist Moral Thinking
Religiosity and Consequentialist Moral Thinking 2 Three studies demonstrated that the moral judgments of religious individuals and political conservatives are highly insensitive to consequentialist (i.e., outcome-based) considerations. In Study 1, both religiosity and political conservatism predicted a resistance towards consequentialist thinking concerning a range of transgressive acts, indepe...
متن کاملCapital Punishment: A Philosophical Rejection of Punishment by Death
Experiencing ubiquitous contention, the correlation between execution as a form of legal punishment and morality pervades in the modern era to form a central concern for examination. Competing accounts of moral theories have provided dichotomous vindications for capital punishment, indicating a substantial strife in criminal justice morality. This thesis will examine these rival philosophies in...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009